I left to write for a bit 'of time, mainly due to personal problems, but also to try to understand something. And 'Just over a week from a great test of direct democracy . I refer of course to V-Day 8 September .
confess that at midnight on September 8, returned home, tired but happy, my first intention was to write on my blog and rush of emotions, hopes. I felt a bit 'as those adolescents who have given their first kiss and can not wait to tell someone.
Then the rational part of me "suggested" to wait for the day later, to try to understand what had happened, to obtain a more comprehensive and not limited to what had happened to Turin.
I went to bed happy for what I did, for what I've seen a peaceful demonstration and strangely orderly (I say oddly knowing we Italians) and non-violence charge that useless that Mr. D'Alema has seen.
The next day, and indeed everyone else, I tried to understand something from national media in the first place (Television, Radio and Newspapers). But apart from the silence dissent or not I found another. Inside of me already suspected this "ignorance" were not professionals squares (real unions and leftist political parties ?) plus not so "politically correct" (real news, radio news and newspapers?).
Returning to the comparison of the adolescent and the kiss. It 's like having told my first kiss, they had told me that I did something totally wrong, immoral. Someone made me feel "dirty", he told me that I should be ashamed , but my dear Casini, if you do not shame her for all he has done in his political life because it should I?
besmirched the honor of Biagi ? It hurts if I remember that before he was killed he had written a letter also because she had this fear? It hurts to know that a Government Minister (Scajola) which she supported, removed the spare Marco Biagi? Remember that the same minister said on said
"It was a pain in the ass who wanted to renew the consulting contract."But let us stop at first you bring up every time a dead person, we are holding a dance in the law that was later labeled him who he may not have wanted. A law plain (also made and approved by you, Mr. Casini), a law is not enforced well (maybe). Me and a friend while we continue to cercarce to understand something of the Law 30/2003 , I will continue to call it without disturbing anyone. Article 3 was analyzed by Anna very well, please pay a visit to his blog and read the good work she has done .
Returning to the V-Day, the day after. After the first comments I got skinny one thing: the cult of politicians and their friends a bit 'scared and then down to throw discredit on Grillo, who has the merit of having channeled a widespread discontent in the country, not to have created or fostered. In
row with me in Turin there were "dangerous" little old ladies armed with goggles, children "xenophobic" accompanying adults with a knife between his teeth, ready to do summary justice. And the best thing that someone could read also say that the reality was this. On gentlemen, a bit 'of seriousness. In Turin, as in Bologna, as in Palermo, Rome, Milan and a hundred cities were a diverse representation of Italian society: workers, entrepreneurs, professionals, young and old, men and women, people on the left, center and right. Everyone asked
3 simple steps, which have no "political flag," but that of common sense: 1) No person convicted in the Parliament for final determination. 2) No more than two terms of office. 3) No party to unilaterally choosing representatives who will sit in Parliament.
If step one, not even the most Conservative politician could argue, for point two in particular, were cited Pertini, De Gasperi example of such political figures who are not able to be what they were if they had stopped two legislatures. What a pity that they are able to cite only two people in the several hundreds of get used Parliament. My dear, but the only way of doing politics is in Parliament? In ten years you can not do something good? Finally, step 3. I dream of a country unrelated to the parties, the ideologies of two centuries ago, pawns in the hands of the secretary of the Party. Do you really believe that the country's destiny is decided in Parliament? I dream of a parliament with people thinking and non-partisan automatons. Members who feel connected to those who have voted not to party affiliation. MPs close to the people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment